Thesis:
By artfully using rhetorical questions, drawing unlikely parallels, and
bringing coincidences to light, Patrick Clark creates a thought provoking
argument in regards Osama Bin Laden’s death.
1) Clark’s
article is littered with rhetorical questions ranging from “whose justice
exactly?” to “Shouldn’t this [lack of forgiveness] bother us as Christians?”
Clark’s questions pull not only from basic ethics, but also from Catholic and
general Christian belief. Clark occasionally
begs the question, implying that his view of mercy and justice is correct.
Nevertheless, the use of such devices gives credibility, provoking the audience
to think deeper than just on the death of Osama Bin Laden.
2) Clark
also uses unlike parallels between Christ’s and Bin Laden’s death in order to evoke regret in the audience’s mind. He intertwines his parallels with beautiful
questions, causing the audience to rethink the celebration of Bin Laden’s
death, answering our questions of justice with the “blood that flows from
Christ’s side.”
3) Besides
parallels, Clark also brings up several coincidences, specifically the fact that
Bin Laden was killed on Divine Mercy Sunday, that John Paul II spoke about
loving the enemy, and that while we buried Bin Laden, it was in a way of
corporal justice.
I like how you mention the parallels to Christ's death. Did you find his argument compelling from a logical standpoint?
ReplyDeleteI feel like the parallels, since Christ and Bin Laden were so different, really helped the logos. Even though it was an overstatement, it really drove his argument.
ReplyDelete